main valve was connected by a long stem to a
handle on top of the hydrant barrel that stood
about two feet above the ground surface.
Threads under the handle moved the stem and
valve up or down when the handle was turned. A
separate rod down the outside of the hydrant’s
barrel and connected to the handle, also moved
to control a small drain opening located below
the frost line on the side of the barrel just above
the main valve. It opened when the main valve
was closed allowing water drainage to prevent
freezing in winter. Hydrants of this type are
called “dry barrel” because water is only in the
upper part of the hydrant above the frost line
during use (Figure 3).
One of the more challenging aspects of
recording the history of fire hydrant design is the
variety of designs that existed, especially from
the middle of the 19th century. The variety stems
in part from the great pride towns had in their
water systems. Hydrants, perhaps the single
most visible feature of a system, became objects
of that pride and were cast with elaborate surface decorations. Like Philadelphia, almost
every water system had its unique hydrant design
custom made by a local foundry.
Figure 3—Historical records credit the Philadelphia
Water System as the origin of the fire hydrant as we
know it in the United States. This post-style hydrant,
designed by Philadelphia’s water superintendent in 1803,
used a conical main valve made of leather with a brass
seat placed on top of the water main.
Americans Favor Philly Design
At the time, both European-style “flush hydrants”
and Philadelphia-style “post hydrants” were in use.
It was also a time when several volunteer fire
brigades might arrive at a fire at about the same
time, vying for control of the available hydrants. It
was pride, once again, that seemed to favor the post
style winning out in America. According to an 1865
article, “In the hurly-burly of a fire-alarm...a fireman looks more picturesque seated on the hydrant
which he has secured for his ‘machine,’ and can
maintain his position better against the next com-ers, than over a flush case, without such salient
points; besides this, it [the post-style
hydrant]...certainly looks better in the engraving of
his certificate or elaborate art adornments of his
engine and fire house.” 1
It wasn’t just exterior decoration that set the
early hydrants apart. Several ways were used to
control water, including gate and compression main
valves, and a “knuckle” arrangement (Figures 4
and 5).
Most of today’s hydrants share the basic design
concept of the 1803 Philadelphia design. The com-pression-style valve, now made of rubber, closes in
the direction of water flow. Water pressure tends to
force the valve into tighter contact with its seat,
making it easier to achieve a reliable seal. Modern
main valves are made to be removable through the
top of the hydrant if repairs are needed.
The stem terminates at the top of modern
hydrants with an operating nut instead of a handle.
The operating nut is usually in the shape of a penta-
Operating nut
Bonnet
Barrel
Operating stem
Breakaway Parts
Drain hole
Foot piece
Seat ring
Main valve
Compression
Figure 4—Cross section of gate and knuckle-style hydrants